The First Uber Death
Yesterday, I posted about the Libertarian delusional dream that is Uber.
Today, I read about an Uber driver hitting 3 pedestrians, killing a 6-year old girl
:
In their blog, they said that, "This tragedy did not involve a vehicle or provider doing a trip on the Uber system.
Notice what they did not say? They did not say that he wasn't logged in, and that he wasn't waiting for some of those lucrative, "Onslaughts of high-priced trips."
Why else would he be driving around San Francisco on New Years Eve?
Driving? In San Francisco? On New Years Eve? That is nucking futs! ……… Unless, of course, you are there to make some bank by getting dispatches from a certain Techno-Randian transportation company.
Then, it makes lots of sense.
It is telling that Uber has deliberately chosen a model which is structured largely to evade any responsibility, or liability, for the misdeeds of its drivers.
H/t Crooks & Liars.
Today, I read about an Uber driver hitting 3 pedestrians, killing a 6-year old girl
:
Update, 11:35 a.m.: Uber confirmed that Muzzafar was, indeed a contractor with the company. It's since deactivated his account. An Uber spokesman stressed, again, that Muzzafar was not "providing services through the Uber system" at the time he struck and killed a 6 year-old girl at Polk and Ellis Streets.Notice the non denial denial?
Update, 9:46 a.m.: Police release name and photo of the self-identified Uber driver (See bottom).
It's been a rough year for Uber thus far. Just four hours before the car-hire startup planned to ring in 2014 -- ideally with an onslaught of high-priced trips through San Francisco's bustling downtown corridor -- one of its contracted drivers allegedly hit a family in a Tenderloin crosswalk, killing a 6-year-old girl and critically injuring her mother and brother.
"There are no words to express the deep sadness and grief felt for young San Francisco resident, Sophia Liu," Supervisor Jane Kim wrote in a statement issued shortly after the young girl's death.
Kim added that the accident would have been "100 percent avoidable" had the driver followed basic traffic laws. She considered the incident a harbinger for app-based car-hire startups, indicating that it raises questions about driver training and compliance.
In their blog, they said that, "This tragedy did not involve a vehicle or provider doing a trip on the Uber system.
Notice what they did not say? They did not say that he wasn't logged in, and that he wasn't waiting for some of those lucrative, "Onslaughts of high-priced trips."
Why else would he be driving around San Francisco on New Years Eve?
Driving? In San Francisco? On New Years Eve? That is nucking futs! ……… Unless, of course, you are there to make some bank by getting dispatches from a certain Techno-Randian transportation company.
Then, it makes lots of sense.
It is telling that Uber has deliberately chosen a model which is structured largely to evade any responsibility, or liability, for the misdeeds of its drivers.
H/t Crooks & Liars.
No comments:
Post a Comment